因?yàn)?/c>各種原因而被拒,而其中大部分原因是可以避免的。
And the scientific method, with its laborious procedures and peer review, ensures we won't know for certain in the foreseeable future.
而科學(xué)手段,由于充滿了繁瑣的步驟以及需要同行的驗(yàn)證,已經(jīng)使我們無法在可預(yù)見的未來里找到答案。
The findings, published in the peer review journal Nature today, have prompted calls for a radical rethink on tackling climate change.
上述研究結(jié)果發(fā)表在4月30日的同行評(píng)審期刊《自然》(Nature)雜志上,這些發(fā)現(xiàn)已促使人們呼吁,對(duì)應(yīng)對(duì)氣候變化的方式進(jìn)行徹底反思。
The process of peer review means journalists can usually assume that published work is of a high standard and worth reporting.
有了同行評(píng)議的過程,意味著記者能夠假設(shè)已出版論文是高質(zhì)量并且值得報(bào)道的。
" NEJM's editors said in a statement that they are " pleased that the confidentiality of the peer-review process remains intact.
NEJM的編輯在一份聲明中說“請(qǐng)不要損害同行評(píng)審過程的機(jī)密性。”
He became the very model of a modern major scientist without benefit of graduate school, grants or even much peer review.
他成了現(xiàn)代的大多數(shù)沒有享有研究院津貼、專項(xiàng)撥款或甚至是大量同業(yè)審查的科學(xué)家的真正典范。
Peer Review is considered to be domestic and international science fund project selection process is the most critical.
同行評(píng)議被認(rèn)為是國內(nèi)外科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目評(píng)審程序中的最關(guān)鍵一環(huán),是科研項(xiàng)目評(píng)審制度的生命線。
"It's very heavy-handed of the OMB to come in and regulate peer review, " Waxman charges.
華克斯曼指稱:「OMB想介入并管理同儕審查是非常霸道的做法。」
Peer review is a powerful tool for sharing knowledge of an implementation, and streamlining it to be more robust and maintainable.
同行審查是一個(gè)共享實(shí)現(xiàn)知識(shí)的強(qiáng)大的工具,它能夠使系統(tǒng)代碼更加強(qiáng)壯和可維護(hù)。
While an essential cornerstone of science, peer-review "is not foolproof, " as the founders of Real Climate explained a long while back.
但作為科學(xué)的必要基石,同業(yè)互評(píng)“并不是絕對(duì)正確的”,真實(shí)氣候(RealClimate)的創(chuàng)始人們在很久以前就解釋過這一點(diǎn)。
It is widely assumed that peer review has positive effects on the quality of submitted papers and of biomedical research.
人們普遍認(rèn)為,同儕綜述了積極影響提交了論文的質(zhì)量和生物醫(yī)學(xué)研究。
Peer review innovation because by definition innovators have no peers.
同行評(píng)議創(chuàng)新是由于按照定義,創(chuàng)新者沒有同行。
The panel is charged with producing conclusions by the end of August, which will then go out for peer review.
該小組負(fù)責(zé)在8月底之前形成結(jié)論,然后面世交同行審查。
Each article is subjected to a peer review to ensure the fairness and accuracy of the views expressed.
每篇文章都經(jīng)過仔細(xì)審查,以確保所表達(dá)的觀點(diǎn)的公平和準(zhǔn)確。
Second, analysis the status of the evaluation of peer review experts and identifies the main problems.
分析我國科技項(xiàng)目立項(xiàng)同行評(píng)議專家反評(píng)價(jià)現(xiàn)狀,找出存在的主要問題;
Open deposit of accepted manuscripts risks destabilising subscription revenues and undermining peer review.
典藏手稿有一定的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),不但收入不穩(wěn)定,而且破壞同儕評(píng)閱制度。
These users have crafted intellectual property rules, informal networks and peer review mechanisms that transcend borders.
這些用戶創(chuàng)造了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)規(guī)則、非正式網(wǎng)絡(luò)以及超越國界的同級(jí)評(píng)審機(jī)制。
Review CRU's policies and practices for acquiring, assembling, subjecting to peer review and disseminating data and research findings.
審查CRU在獲取信息、搜集信息、提交給同行評(píng)審以及傳播數(shù)據(jù)和公開研究成果方面的政策和習(xí)慣。
Professor Sir John Beddington is to head a peer review group that will analyse sources of data on ash concentrations.
貝丁頓教授率領(lǐng)同業(yè)評(píng)審團(tuán),將分析灰云成分的數(shù)據(jù)來源。
In the latter case, the submission becomes subject to anonymous peer-review by outside scholars of the editor's choosing.
在后一種情況下,提交成為受匿名同行審查通過編輯器的選擇之外的學(xué)者。
Many published papers were flawed, despite leading medical journals' sometimes arrogant insistence on a high standard of peer review.
許多發(fā)表的論文中的觀點(diǎn)是錯(cuò)誤的,盡管前沿的醫(yī)學(xué)期刊有時(shí)自大地堅(jiān)稱對(duì)論文進(jìn)行了高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的業(yè)內(nèi)審核。
restricting the agenda of a technical or peer review advisory committee.
然而對(duì)技術(shù)或同行審議型委員會(huì)議題的限制,會(huì)有一些缺點(diǎn)。
All abstracts of the scientific sections will be submitted to a peer review process.
所有獨(dú)立提交的論文摘要都將由組委會(huì)送出進(jìn)行匿名評(píng)審。
However, experience shows that, without peer review, the quality of publications varies considerably.
然而,經(jīng)驗(yàn)顯示,沒有同儕評(píng)閱,出版品的品質(zhì)差異很大。
Peer review is the critical assessment of manuscripts submitted to journals by experts who are not part of the editorial staff.
同行評(píng)審是一個(gè)重要的評(píng)估期刊投稿稿件的部分,評(píng)審專家并不屬于編輯部。